Oh right this exists. It's not exactly feedback for you, but I'm a little disappointed nobody suggesting is familiar with debate or logical fallacies enough to use them in the quest.

sorry about that.
I'm getting tripped up by the meta aspects in this engelfight. Like it says it's "mind" is the agent's interpretation. So like a hallucination? Could the agent be having a debate with any animal or inanimate object then? If it really is a thing with no reasoning then I can't think of a counter to its claim of being not unjust.
mostly I'm confused

It seemed to most strongly be affected by kome's definition which was an entirely valid definition that also worked against its own aggression. If Justice is the arbitration of conflict (and it usually is; laws and courts prevent vigilante justice and lynchings) then there's no arbitration being done in the conflict between us and the engelkind so it's unjust.

>I'm a little disappointed nobody suggesting is familiar with debate or logical fallacies enough to use them in the quest.

I was expecting a bit more of that to be honest. Not a negative reflection on the people who read my quest but perhaps the thinking games on this website tend to be a bit more diegetic. The whole debate thing is honestly kinda detached from the story.

>Could the agent be having a debate with any animal or inanimate object then? If it really is a thing with no reasoning then I can't think of a counter to its claim of being not unjust.

Obligatory 'defeating this boss is left as an exercise for the reader'. But yeah I'm not sure if this fight is as strong as the others so far. Oh well, lessons for next time.

alright, now the quest is over feel free to let me know what i did well and what i did poorly

I liked the bureaucratic weird vibe, even if it got esoteric at times